|
I feel that for a paying job JPG is not doing the paying customer justice. I see no reason not to shoot raw unless the format/camera is so new that raw converters cannot process the images yet. Space as a constraint and smaller files is definitely not worth the quality loss in most cases. While JPG has gotten better, you have more room to process when shooting raw.
Any seasoned shooter or pro will process basically everything. There is almost no photo that can't be helped with processing. Color correction and getting the most detail possible (especially when extracting from shadows and highlights) can be done to make any photo better. RAW is just better for doing that.
|