View Single Post
      05-03-2017, 10:55 AM   #86
Fundguy1
Major General
Fundguy1's Avatar
2052
Rep
8,339
Posts

Drives: 335 e93
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Orlando, fl

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GuidoK View Post
You really havent got the foggiest idea what my post was about dont you?
And do you think I'm an Aussie?
(I live in europe and there are still over twice as many europeans as americans...those kind of numbers seem to impress you...apparantly its now 2:1 in your logic. Not that that matters, even if only 1 person says something he can still be right.)

Here some more links that prove and clarify my posting and explain the physics a little bit more in detail.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pound_(force)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pound-foot_(torque)

Do you have a technical education? (and if so, in what?)

And where is your source on how the SAE sets your particular ft·lb standard and not ft·lbf?
Because you seem to be pretty sure about SAE's standpoint on that.
Have you actually checked with SAE's Technical Standards Board? (which describes how their technical standards are set)
Why do you assume I'm arguing with you, trying to take any time to show any way to measure horsepower ot torque using any standard from any ciuntry whatsoever? Were you the op? Did you ask the question? Did you provide the OP an answer? No. I'm not because it has NOTHING to do whatsoever with the op original and subsequent questions.

He asked the relationship not the formula. And Aussie was directed at the guts stuck in Nm units, not Kw.
Appreciate 0