07-23-2025, 11:45 AM | #1 |
S0THPAW
![]() 9145
Rep 7,885
Posts |
E36 M3 Compact (1 of 2 Ever) Driven on Track
![]() Featured on BIMMERPOST.com Too much power vs short wheelbase vs 'E30 more or less' rearsuspension : So a no go ![]() Cheers Robin |
07-23-2025, 04:30 PM | #2 |
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() 3165
Rep 1,924
Posts |
Compact and a traditional E36 have the the same wheelbase. It's the rear over hang that's different. I have had three S5X powered compacts and and 4 E30's with M/S5x engines Makes for a fun car. Always wanted to find a M52B28 Alum block from a 97 or 98 Z3 but settled with what I had iron blocks.
|
Appreciate
2
///M TOWN34730.00 ClearMinded105.50 |
Today, 09:09 AM | #3 | |
Major General
![]() ![]() 1663
Rep 6,467
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
997.2
F30.F11.E86.E90.E90.E36 |
|
Appreciate
1
///M TOWN34730.00 |
Today, 12:05 PM | #4 |
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() 3165
Rep 1,924
Posts |
It did but the M3 Compact's was reinforced aka the M Coupe that had big brakes. and proper offset for the bigger wheels.
Compacts were built to compete with the onslaught of fast fwd cars coming from Japan and Germany at the time and BMW did not have a cheap car to market at them so this was drawn up on the fly. Was cheap to insure and cheap on gas. There were only 4 engines available the 1.6l 1.8 single and twin cam in M42 and M44 variants and the M52b23 for EU only. Hartge and ACS both did versions of them. I will say I do miss mine but they rust out easily. |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|