AngelinIsRich08 wrote

PC FTW. Apple for artsy shit.

.:bHd:. wrote

hate when people say that. Almost every "artsy" program is available on both systems. It's not the tool you use its how you use it

M3Bahn wrote

Here is your master.

koreez88 wrote

I'm an average user and have both mac (personal) and pc (work). It all depends heavily on OS. Windows 7 is marginally better than anything Microsoft had to offer in the past. I'd say it's not as easy to use as Mac, but wins in terms of software availability. Overall, Windows 7 is on par with Snow Leopard for me.

AngelinIsRich08 wrote

PC FTW. Apple for artsy shit.

Kiemyster wrote

And I'm proud to be on his team. I do love that company, and I'd shout it from the heavens just like him if someone gave me a speakerphone in NYC. Anyone who doesnt feel this way about their computers are just jelly



Fair enough.... I think the biggest advantage of W7 for the average user is the new troubleshooting features which make things much easier to figure out for the less experienced, and 99% of the time the network troubleshooter resolves any issues on its own. Definitely useful.



All I can say, is that most (if not all) technologies that are used for life saving situations are not powered by apple. Im talking about anything that is to be used in serious situations. Ever seen ATC systems run by Macs? any medical equipment built with apple technology? military/rescue equipment runs on what?

Ive never seen Apple products deployed in any sort of life threatening or life saving situation :thumbsup:

ABQ325i wrote

All PC's are not better than Macs.

I'm willing to concede that custom built machines can be built more powerful than Macs, but I am not going to agree that an entry level eMachines from Best Buy is superior to the current entry level machine at the Apple store.

Crimson92 wrote

i dont know why this is a pc vs mac question.

it should be a windows vs osx question.

windows>osx.

$ perl -le 'print eval join "+" => map { ord } split "", "@ARGV"' snow leopard

1230



$ perl -le 'print eval join "+" => map { ord } split "", "@ARGV"' windows 7

866

Kiemyster wrote

All I can say, is that most (if not all) technologies that are used for life saving situations are not powered by apple. Im talking about anything that is to be used in serious situations. Ever seen ATC systems run by Macs? any medical equipment built with apple technology? military/rescue equipment runs on what?

Ive never seen Apple products deployed in any sort of life threatening or life saving situation

.:bHd:. wrote

Ipads are being used in the military for maps, also they are replacing paper manuals on airplanes.

now stfu

DougLikesBMW wrote

iPads are so fucking annoyingly limited...just how Apple likes it. That's why Apple can choke on a dick and die in a fire. Their products fucking suck in comparison to other companies.

And lmao, but no iPads are not replacing paper manuals on airplanes. What a crock of a shit.

brb no free pretzels or peanuts on this flight, but here sir please feel free to use this ipad to see what to do in case of emergency

ragingclue wrote

Ok I'm a bit worried that the pilot needs a manual for the plane. Shouldn't he/she already know all that shit? I don't want to be on board with a guy using some L2fly app on an iPad as he goes....

E90SoFlo wrote

He's playing angry birds.

ragingclue wrote

Or dicking around with his 10,000 fart apps.

E90SoFlo wrote

don't be jelly