http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2008/12/14/2008-12-14_governor_paterson_proposes_obesity_tax_a-1.html
I guess no more diet coke for me
27.7KVIEWS
23REPLIES
0APPRECIATES
12ACTIVE PEOPLE
12-23-2008LAST POST
12-20-2008
12-20-2008
johnnymu
Warranty Killer
136
REP
1K
POSTS
12-20-2008
12-20-2008
number335
Second Lieutenant
23
REP
254
POSTS
Wait a minute. It's called an "Obesity Tax", yet anyone who buys a non-diet drink would have to pay more, regardless if they are obese? I don't see how this tax bill gets passed.
12-20-2008
12-20-2008
12-20-2008
Bobby_Light
Major
68
REP
1.4K
POSTS
Talk about COMPLETE ignorance of facts. Diet soda contains chemical sweeteners (splenda/sucralose, aspartame) that flat out should not be ingested by humans. Diet soda makes you fatter than regular soda. If you need a sweeteners use stevia, a natural herb with no affect on blood sugar.
How about we educate people about eating a real diet and have food companies actually list exactly what they are putting in foods.
How about we educate people about eating a real diet and have food companies actually list exactly what they are putting in foods.
12-20-2008
12-20-2008
DougLikesBMW
Fapmin
504
REP
2.7K
POSTS
Bobby_Light wrote+1...And don't forget that there is shit in diet drinks that promotes cancer. The chemical starts with an 'a' can't remember it though.Talk about COMPLETE ignorance of facts. Diet soda contains chemical sweeteners (splenda/sucralose, aspartame) that flat out should not be ingested by humans. Diet soda makes you fatter than regular soda. If you need a sweeteners use stevia, a natural herb with no affect on blood sugar.
How about we educate people about eating a real diet and have food companies actually list exactly what they are putting in foods.
I didn't read the link. but yes they should tax fatties, lol.
12-20-2008
12-20-2008
Razzy
Lieutenant
292
REP
509
POSTS
DougLikesBMW wroteAspartame+1...And don't forget that there is shit in diet drinks that promotes cancer. The chemical starts with an 'a' can't remember it though.
I didn't read the link. but yes they should tax fatties, lol.
12-20-2008
12-20-2008
TiAg335i
Trance Life
368
REP
4.7K
POSTS
That's bullshit. I hate the synthetic sugars they add to Diet Coke, there have even been links to cancer with that shit.
Just because it has more calories doesn't mean fat people drink it. It's actually the other way around. Most fat people drink diet because they want to get skinnier.
Just because it has more calories doesn't mean fat people drink it. It's actually the other way around. Most fat people drink diet because they want to get skinnier.
12-20-2008
12-20-2008
BoostedBMW
Moderator
141
REP
6.8K
POSTS
I haven't drank soda since I was about 15 so this doesn't affect me, but the reasoning behind this tax is extremely retarded. I also think that the argument of which is more unhealthy, regular vs diet soda, is also retarded. Trying to make the argument between artificial sweeteners that may lead to cancer (I think most tests were done on lab rats where a human would have to ingest ridiculous amounts of artificial sweeteners to equal that level in humans) versus regular soda with 40g of sugar per can that will overtime help contribute to insulin resistance and/or diabetes is like arguing which poison is more healthy.
How about we just tax your fat ass if your BF% is over a certain percentage when you go for health insurance, and you will be charged a premium just as if you were a smoker since you will undoubtedly contribute to much higher costs.
How about we just tax your fat ass if your BF% is over a certain percentage when you go for health insurance, and you will be charged a premium just as if you were a smoker since you will undoubtedly contribute to much higher costs.
12-20-2008
12-20-2008
E90ice
Banned
245
REP
2K
POSTS
I thought this was going to be about obese people paying some taxes...for being obese...


12-20-2008
12-20-2008
Bobby_Light
Major
68
REP
1.4K
POSTS
I wish they would refuse to feed HUGE people at fast food joints. If they can cut you off for being too drunk, they should cut you off for eating too much (crap).
We have a really backward health care system in this country. It's atrocious.
We have a really backward health care system in this country. It's atrocious.
12-20-2008
12-20-2008
DougLikesBMW
Fapmin
504
REP
2.7K
POSTS
This was what I was trying to say, but more in depth:p.
I worked at McDonald's a while back for a short stint and the thing I loved most was when fatties would come by and order Supersized whatevertheheck and then ask me for a diet drink at the window. People are just so unbelievable.
I worked at McDonald's a while back for a short stint and the thing I loved most was when fatties would come by and order Supersized whatevertheheck and then ask me for a diet drink at the window. People are just so unbelievable.
BoostedBMW wroteI haven't drank soda since I was about 15 so this doesn't affect me, but the reasoning behind this tax is extremely retarded. I also think that the argument of which is more unhealthy, regular vs diet soda, is also retarded. Trying to make the argument between artificial sweeteners that may lead to cancer (I think most tests were done on lab rats where a human would have to ingest ridiculous amounts of artificial sweeteners to equal that level in humans) versus regular soda with 40g of sugar per can that will overtime help contribute to insulin resistance and/or diabetes is like arguing which poison is more healthy.
How about we just tax your fat ass if your BF% is over a certain percentage when you go for health insurance, and you will be charged a premium just as if you were a smoker since you will undoubtedly contribute to much higher costs.
12-21-2008
12-21-2008
andyffer
Banned
173
REP
563
POSTS
who is going to decide which people are overweight?
Way too complicated, never gonna happen
Way too complicated, never gonna happen
12-21-2008
12-21-2008
DougLikesBMW
Fapmin
504
REP
2.7K
POSTS
andyffer wroteHmm, let's see....BMI, ever heard of it? Body Mass Index?who is going to decide which people are overweight?
Way too complicated, never gonna happen
12-21-2008
12-21-2008
andyffer
Banned
173
REP
563
POSTS
DougLikesBMW wroteSo they are going to test everyone's BMI?Hmm, let's see....BMI, ever heard of it? Body Mass Index?

Then set a bar for that?
12-21-2008
12-21-2008
DougLikesBMW
Fapmin
504
REP
2.7K
POSTS
andyffer wroteThere are already indexes of what a healthy BMI is for height/age.So they are going to test everyone's BMI?
Then set a bar for that?
12-21-2008
12-21-2008
andyffer
Banned
173
REP
563
POSTS
DougLikesBMW wroteSo they have a bar set..There are already indexes of what a healthy BMI is for height/age.
Then "everyone come get you BMI measured"
and if they choose not to? death?

hey I hate obesity too, but I think this tax is silly.
maybe we should just make car seats and airplane seats smaller.
Just kidding. But things like making them pay for 2 seats = perfect
12-21-2008
12-21-2008
DougLikesBMW
Fapmin
504
REP
2.7K
POSTS
andyffer wroteHaha, that reminds me of this time Jay Leno was joking about fatties having to pay for 2 seats, he was acting as a fatty in this skit and said, "Hey, that means I get two meals right?" It was hilarious.So they have a bar set..
Then "everyone come get you BMI measured"
and if they choose not to? death?
hey I hate obesity too, but I think this tax is silly.
maybe we should just make car seats and airplane seats smaller.
Just kidding. But things like making them pay for 2 seats = perfect
To gather data on everyone's BMI is quite simple. Whenever a person goes to the doctor they can easily have thier BMI calculated. It takes like 30 seconds, and then the data could be pooled together.
12-21-2008
12-21-2008
bmstyle71
Captain
117
REP
635
POSTS
andyffer wroteThen you have fat people bitching and complaining about discrimination. Their point is why do I have to pay for 2 seats when a normal weight person doesn't. Well with all due respect, the normal weight person sitting beside you doesn't have his/her 74 pound ass cheek on your lap. Try explaining that to them.maybe we should just make car seats and airplane seats smaller.
12-21-2008
12-21-2008
andyffer
Banned
173
REP
563
POSTS
bmstyle71 wroteyeah exactly.Then you have fat people bitching and complaining about discrimination. Their point is why do I have to pay for 2 seats when a normal weight person doesn't. Well with all due respect, the normal weight person sitting beside you doesn't have his/her 74 pound ass cheek on your lap. Try explaining that to them.
Its like...
One day on a crowded, busy, filthy, subway train, when they come to a stop and more people come in. In walks these 3 nuns. Obviously they are older ladies and cant stand for the whole subway ride. So this nice young man reading a paper, who is clueless to this whole situation, is tapped on the shoulder by a rather robust, "well rounded" woman, asking "why dont you get up and let one of those nuns sit down? It would be the proper thing to do."
The nice young man responds quickly without even looking up, asking "why don't you get up and let all three of the nuns sit down? It would be the proper thing to do."
12-21-2008
12-21-2008
DougLikesBMW
Fapmin
504
REP
2.7K
POSTS
^^^
Lol!
Lol!

12-22-2008
12-22-2008
jaiman
Captain
22
REP
658
POSTS
DougLikesBMW wroteBMI is garbage. Bob Sanders is obese according to BMI.Hmm, let's see....BMI, ever heard of it? Body Mass Index?
12-23-2008
12-23-2008
DougLikesBMW
Fapmin
504
REP
2.7K
POSTS
jaiman wroteYou're right. Some times it doesn't work (on folks with lots of muscle), but it does calculate your body fat percentage.BMI is garbage. Bob Sanders is obese according to BMI.